hebel. today · 15 November 20263 / 79

Science · Data Science Applications

Defining success before shipping AI code

Productivity metrics often track activity rather than business outcomes, leaving teams with high output but little clarity on actual value. Leaders now establish specific objective functions to govern automated development, as finding a metric…

Productivity metrics often track activity rather than business outcomes, leaving teams with high output but little clarity on actual value (Engineering Enablement). Leaders now establish specific objective functions to govern automated development, as finding a metric that reflects actual product usage proves more difficult than optimizing for it (Andrew Zigler from Dev Interrupted). Teams that define clear success criteria, target users, and scope boundaries before triggering AI agents prevent unnecessary scope expansion and focus their engineering efforts on critical paths (April Yang from 90% Confident, April Yang from 90% Confident).

Effective observability requires shifting from blind cuts to usage-based analysis, where teams identify metrics that have not been queried in 90 days for safe removal (Chronicles of a SRE). Founders now build regression tables that track test set performance across model changes to provide investors with concrete evidence of product stability (Mohamed F. Ahmed from AI-Native Founder). These structured approaches replace guesswork with data, ensuring that technical projects prioritize reliability and meaningful progress over vanity statistics (Gritletter Clear thinking for builders…).

  • Baymard Institute reports that 17% of US online shoppers abandoned purchases in the last three months due to overly complex checkout processes (User Experience University).
  • Odessia, an AI travel agent, was acquired by OpenAI 27 days after its public launch, highlighting the risk of model companies shipping directly against developers (Mohamed F. Ahmed from AI-Native Founder).
  • Grok Bot 1.0 now enables teams to publish shared agents for Slack, Microsoft Teams, and video calls to assist with meeting tasks (TLDR AI).

Try today · 40 min

Create a regression table for your current AI-assisted coding task.

List your failure log, a test set of 30 inputs, and the resulting scores before and after your last three prompt changes.

You need

  • Failure log of recent issues
  • List of 20 common real-world inputs
  • Table template with columns for prompt version, score, and specific case failures

Steps

  1. Select a recurring coding task where you use AI.
  2. Identify the 10 most common failure points from your logs.
  3. Add 20 standard inputs to create a 30-case test set.
  4. Run the test set through your current prompt and record the baseline score.
  5. Apply a change and re-run the test set to document the new score.
  6. Log any regressions by specific case ID.

One email instead of your newsletter pile.

Forward the newsletters you already get (a Gmail filter does it) and tell Hebel your goals. Every morning it reads them with 20,000 others and sends one short email, with one small thing to do today. Fewer emails, not more. Free during beta.

Start my paper →
LinkedIn X

Sources

  1. Andrew Zigler, Dev Interrupted on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personThis piece explains why software factories need objective functions and why usage data is the only defensible metric for AI products.

  2. Engineering Enablement on hebel. →André Meyer discusses why AI usage metrics fail to capture business value and how to select metrics based on organizational maturity.

  3. Chronicles of a SRE on hebel. →This guide provides specific queries for Prometheus and Splunk to identify unused metrics and safely reduce observability costs.

  4. Mohamed F. Ahmed, AI-Native Founder on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personThis article details how to build a regression table and test set to prove product stability to investors or stakeholders.

  5. User Experience University on hebel. →This report links checkout abandonment rates to business revenue, providing a framework for justifying design and engineering improvements.

  6. Gritletter Clear thinking for builders… on hebel. →The author outlines why leadership requires making choices between competing priorities rather than attempting to accommodate every request.

  7. April Yang, 90% Confident on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personThis post defines the five essential questions to answer before asking AI to generate code to ensure alignment with user needs.

  8. TLDR AI on hebel. →

More in Science

SpaceX catches Starship upper stage in historic tower maneuver

Permitting reform pits climate action against nature protection

Mechanisms or empathy: how to bridge the scientific meaning gap

Data Science Applications yesterday

Substack and GitHub trade manual queries for operational evidence

Sign in to Hebel first

Likes, your collection and done Hebel need an account. We email you a six digit code; no password.