hebel. today · 11 November 202631 / 73

Business · Startups

Testing your product ideas before building them

Product-first validation. Founders who prioritize building a functional tool argue that market proof requires evidence of utility. ChiBrations secured $13,500 in prize money by demonstrating a live application on app stores, as the issue…

Product-first validation. Founders who prioritize building a functional tool argue that market proof requires evidence of utility. ChiBrations secured $13,500 in prize money by demonstrating a live application on app stores, as the issue on Thursday showed. Maria Mazur suggests beginning with a priced offer and a payment test to force a confrontation with the question of whether customers will pay (Maria Mazur from Mazurly). This framework demands that founders complete administrative operations and verify checkout paths before accepting orders.

Market-first discovery. Other founders argue that building before selling risks creating a solution for a non-existent problem. Material Security pitched four distinct business concepts to Netflix’s security team to let the market choose the direction before writing any code. Chris Federspiel at Blackthorn let inbound leads dictate the market and cut nine products back to two, reaching $14M ARR without venture capital (Nathan Latka from Founderpath Blog). Marily Nika uses AI agents to debate minimum feature sets to challenge assumptions and narrow the product scope before development begins (Marily’s AI Product Academy Newsletter).

Strategic alignment. These paths diverge on the timing of the build. One camp treats the product as the primary asset to prove value, while the other treats the market interaction as the primary tool to define the product. Both methods share a reliance on early, concrete evidence to avoid building on a hallucinated blank slate (Amy Bonsall from Light Actions Brief).

Try today · 20 min

Simulate a debate between two AI agents to define your minimum viable product features

Use Perplexity to force a disagreement between a proponent and a critic of your current project.

You need

  • Perplexity account
  • List of your core product features
  • Target customer profile

Steps

  1. Open Perplexity and paste your product idea description.
  2. Input the prompt to create two agents with opposing perspectives.
  3. Instruct the agents to debate until they reach agreement on the minimum feature set.
  4. Add a third agent to cross-check the final list for hallucinations.
  5. Review the agreed feature set against your current development plan.

One email instead of your newsletter pile.

Forward the newsletters you already get (a Gmail filter does it) and tell Hebel your goals. Every morning it reads them with 20,000 others and sends one short email, with one small thing to do today. Fewer emails, not more. Free during beta.

Start my paper →
LinkedIn X

Sources

  1. Nathan Latka, Founderpath Blog on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personBlackthorn's path to $14M ARR demonstrates how inbound demand should dictate product focus and market selection.

  2. Maria Mazur, Mazurly on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personMaria Mazur provides a roadmap for validating demand through priced offers and payment tests before building a website.

  3. Marily’s AI Product Academy Newsletter on hebel. →Marily Nika explains how to use AI agents to debate and refine product features to reach product-market fit.

  4. Amy Bonsall, Light Actions Brief on hebel. → ✎ Written by a personAmy Bonsall highlights the risks of designing products on a hallucinated blank slate without verifying real-world constraints.

More in Business

When preparation becomes a prison

Private equity firms clash over control of portfolio companies

Holdout tests replace feature lists for software validation

The biophysical limits of financial growth

Making the founder redundant

Startups yesterday

Debug your sales process like production code

Sign in to Hebel first

Likes, your collection and done Hebel need an account. We email you a six digit code; no password.